Post-event Update on "INAUGURAL SCL (SINGAPORE) DEBATE: Construction Contracts in Singapore are Inherently Biased Towards Employers" (24 Aug 2011)

The SCL (Singapore) held its annual construction industry debate on Wednesday, 24 August 2011. The proposed motion was:

"This house believes Singapore construction contracts are inherently biased towards the employer".

Mr. Christopher Nunns, Chairman of SCL (Singapore) introduced the speakers. Chris highlighted to attendees this was intended to be a "fun" debate: Views expressed by the speakers may not be their actual views. He thanked the speakers in advance for entering into the spirit of the debate.

The team proposing the motion (the "hats") was led by Bill Gallagher, with team members James Taylor and Mohan Pillay. They were presented with yellow construction safety helmets to wear for the debate. The opposition team (the "red shirts") was led by Eugene Seah, assisted by Calvin Pereira and Daniel Koh. All opposition team members wore red shirts.

Bill Gallagher opened the debate with a well presented argument that Singapore construction contracts are inherently biased towards employers. Eugene Seah replied from the opposing perspective ending his argument with a commendable summary "rap".

After each team had put forward second speakers to reinforce their arguments, the debate was opened to the floor. A lively feedback session followed and comments from the audience were thoughtfully responded to by the debating teams. Each team then presented its third speakers.

Chris Nunns wrapped up the debate and thanked speakers for their considerable time and effort. The final voting decision was made by a "show of hands". Chris announced that the "hats" proposing the motion.

For a more detailed summary of the debated arguments by Dr. Anand Jude Anthony, please click HERE.